On 1/14/15 8:56 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
What are the odds that the behavior observable by web pages can actually
be defined sanely such that ES invariants and compatibility requirements
are satisfied?
My personal best estimate is about 30% chance for the one such
definition we have so far being web compatible. But this is mostly
based on gut feeling.
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27128#c15
indicates, as I understand it, the odds may be quite good. In that case,
looking for a volunteer to come up with a proposal might be a good next
step.
We have a proposal. It's at https://github.com/domenic/window-proxy-spec
I have an implementation that I've been trying to land in Firefox for a
few weeks. I had to fix a bunch of our tests, then restrict the change
to web pages because it breaks various extensions. I'm pretty hopeful
that I can at least get it to the point where I can try doing some web
compat testing...
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1107443 for those who want
to follow along.
-Boris
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
