agreed ... between `self` and `callee` probably `self` is better. Anyone with a different/new idea?
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Claude Pache <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Alternative name for `function.callee`: I find that `function.self` > sounds > > better in case of recursive call (and probably in other cases as well). > > Agreed that "callee", while technically accurate, is a clumsy word and > something like "self" sounds better. "function.self", in particular, > seems to communicate the right semantic, and implies that you're > receiving a function . > > It doesn't feel... apt, I think, to bring the caller/callee > relationship to mind when you're not trying to deal with that > relationship; all you're trying to do is recurse on yourself, in the > case where you don't have a name to refer to yourself with. The fact > that you're running because someone else called you is irrelevant to > this dynamic. > > ~TJ > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
