function.current? ________________________________ From: Andrea Giammarchi<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: 2015-02-26 18:56 To: Tab Atkins Jr.<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: es-discuss<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: Proposal: Additional Meta Properties for ES7
agreed ... between `self` and `callee` probably `self` is better. Anyone with a different/new idea? On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Claude Pache <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Alternative name for `function.callee`: I find that `function.self` sounds > better in case of recursive call (and probably in other cases as well). Agreed that "callee", while technically accurate, is a clumsy word and something like "self" sounds better. "function.self", in particular, seems to communicate the right semantic, and implies that you're receiving a function . It doesn't feel... apt, I think, to bring the caller/callee relationship to mind when you're not trying to deal with that relationship; all you're trying to do is recurse on yourself, in the case where you don't have a name to refer to yourself with. The fact that you're running because someone else called you is irrelevant to this dynamic. ~TJ _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
