>Unfortunately, we can't use a magic method name. Just to throw out a couple
>of other ideas though:
>Contextual keyword after constructor:
>
> class C {
> constructor() { /* new me */ }
> constructor call() { /* call me */ }
> }
This one looks like the most readable — I would make a slight adjustment:
class C {
constructor() { /* new me *. }
call constructor() { /* call me */ }
}
(just for the purpose of readability)
I think it might be hard to mix this up with computed property names, so `call
[‘constructor’]()` might be a no-go? same with `[‘constructor’] call()` tbh
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 12:20 PM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I like the idea of a special syntactic form a lot. One of the nice things
> about `constructor` is that it's easy to explain "you [[Construct]] with the
> constructor". We can't use `call` similarly any more, but I totally agree
> something like it would be pretty nice.
>
> Unfortunately, we can't use a magic method name. Just to throw out a couple
> of other ideas though:
>
> Parens sans method name:
>
> class C {
> constructor() { /* new me */ }
> () { /* call me */ }
> }
>
> Contextual keyword after constructor:
>
> class C {
> constructor() { /* new me */ }
> constructor call() { /* call me */ }
> }
>
> With a "dot" instead:
>
> class C {
> constructor() { /* new me */ }
> constructor.call() { /* call me */ }
> }
>
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
