On 9 April 2015 at 08:46, Jussi Kalliokoski <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yesterday I came up with an idea for syntactic sugar for partial > application, introducing two new operators: placeholder (`?`) and rest > placeholder (`???`). > While this looks nice, I'm not sure it's worth new syntax as it can be adequately implemented in a library, as you point out with lodash. The library implementation could handle a rest placeholder too. E.g. `foo.partial(1, _arg, 2, _rest, 3)` (or with whatever names you prefer, could be imports from a module). What's the big advantage of syntactic sugar here?
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
