We cannot introduce a global property named `global` at this point.
I don't think everyone replying lately has read the whole thread
carefully :-|.
/be
Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
Sure workers too, but it doesn't in server side and it doesn't mean
anything meaningful for all developers coming from other languages.
`self` is a misleading word and in ES6 specs we have mentioned global
object and never a single word for the `self` keyword, or its meaning.
`global` does not need that kind of explanation you put down for
historical purpose, `global` is well known meaning for everyone in JS
world, including members in this ML that would refer to the global
scope, and the global object, regardless they mean sometimes `realm`
... or isn't it?
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Brendan Eich <bren...@mozilla.org
<mailto:bren...@mozilla.org>> wrote:
The principle extends just fine to workers, and has.
/be
Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
And that's indeed the only place on Web world where `self`
makes sense:
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
