Why not use a function declaration instead?
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:37 PM Alexander Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> Propose adding support for
>
> let function foo() {};
>
> which would have the equivalence of:
>
> let foo = function foo() {};
>
> The idea is to support the normal scoping of let, but without forcing you
> to repeat yourself when naming the function, whilst still having the
> function's name property be set.
>
> This would trivially extend to const and var. Also, possibly class.
>
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
