I guess 'cause that cannot be scoped, let's say in a for loop ... but yeah, I think that's not the most needed thing in the language right now, yet another shortcut with double reserved words one after the other
Regards On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not use a function declaration instead? > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:37 PM Alexander Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Propose adding support for >> >> let function foo() {}; >> >> which would have the equivalence of: >> >> let foo = function foo() {}; >> >> The idea is to support the normal scoping of let, but without forcing you >> to repeat yourself when naming the function, whilst still having the >> function's name property be set. >> >> This would trivially extend to const and var. Also, possibly class. >> >> Thanks >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
