I'd like to give https://github.com/benjamingr/RegExp.escape/issues/29 another week *please, if you have a strong opinion voice it* after which we'll settle on a hopefully *final* API for RegExp.escape in terms of the escaped parts.
Some parts so you won't have to read the whole thread (debated issues): - Numeric literals are escaped at the start of the string to not interfere with capturing groups (yes/no) - Hex characters ([0-9a-f]) are escaped at the start of the string to not interfere with unicode escape sequences (yes/no) - `/` is escaped to support passing a RegExp string to eval (yes/no)? And so on. On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> wrote: > As a cross-cutting concern I'd like the feedback of more people on > https://github.com/benjamingr/RegExp.escape/issues/29 > > Basically we've got to make a design choice of readable output vs. > potentially safer output. > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
