> modulo the obvious mistake

Oops. x]

> you could use it as a vdom library as almost like a Lisp reader macro:

That would be interesting. There's still lots of runtime processing
though. Maybe a build-time tool can also optimize it though, but if it
happens to be executed at runtime it'll just work. Here's a JSX-like
concept, let's call it 'xjs' for sake of argument:

```
let style = {background: 'turquoise'}
let content = xjs`<p>hello</p>`
let el = xjs`
  <div style=${styleObject}>
    ${content}
  </div>
`
```

It could be compiled statically as well as have a runtime template-tag
implementation.

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Isiah Meadows <[email protected]> wrote:
> A use I thought up (although I got lazy and abandoned it later) was an
> `exec` template tag, for executing commands. Or, and this just came off the
> to of my head, you could use it as a vdom library as almost like a Lisp
> reader macro:
>
> ```js
> n`.form-ctrl`(
>   n`input#input`("input"),
>   n`a[href="/submit.html"]`("Submit"))
> ```
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016, 17:34 Alexander Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> The two code samples you posted are equivalent (modulo the obvious
>> mistake). AFAIU there is still only a single parsing pass for template
>> strings.
>>
>> On Tuesday, 12 January 2016, /#!/JoePea <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> The thing with template strings is that they are used at runtime. This
>>> could be slow if we're compiling things at runtime all the time,
>>> whereas a server-side templating solution might lead JavaScript
>>> functions compiled from templates (like in the case with Meteor Blaze
>>> Spacebars or React JSX), which can be faster at runtime.
>>>
>>> What are template strings good for besides the obvious benefit that
>>> they make things like
>>>
>>> ```
>>> var str = "llo"
>>> console.log(`he${str} world!`)
>>> ```
>>>
>>> easier to read than
>>>
>>> ```
>>> var str = "llo"
>>> console.log('he'+'str'+' world!')
>>> ```
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Maybe writing regexes can be nicer with template strings? I gave it a
>>> try at npmjs.com/regexr.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Manuel Di Iorio <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Yes Bob, after a personal testing with a complete template engine using
>>> > the
>>> > ES6 template strings, I realized that their use (in mine use case, of
>>> > course) is slowest than the approach that I'm using right now (like the
>>> > Underscore template). Thanks everyone :)
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > es-discuss mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to