That link details other reasons, such as tooling.

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016, 18:11 Isiah Meadows <[email protected]> wrote:

> Problem is: your idea has already been tried and found to be pretty slow.
> React devs did briefly consider this, but found that it had fundamental
> speed limitations. And precompilation is already happening with existing
> templates, even though building them normally is still cheap to do.
>
> http://facebook.github.io/jsx/#why-not-template-literals
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016, 05:45 /#!/JoePea <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> > modulo the obvious mistake
>>
>> Oops. x]
>>
>> > you could use it as a vdom library as almost like a Lisp reader macro:
>>
>> That would be interesting. There's still lots of runtime processing
>> though. Maybe a build-time tool can also optimize it though, but if it
>> happens to be executed at runtime it'll just work. Here's a JSX-like
>> concept, let's call it 'xjs' for sake of argument:
>>
>> ```
>> let style = {background: 'turquoise'}
>> let content = xjs`<p>hello</p>`
>> let el = xjs`
>>   <div style=${styleObject}>
>>     ${content}
>>   </div>
>> `
>> ```
>>
>> It could be compiled statically as well as have a runtime template-tag
>> implementation.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Isiah Meadows <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > A use I thought up (although I got lazy and abandoned it later) was an
>> > `exec` template tag, for executing commands. Or, and this just came off
>> the
>> > to of my head, you could use it as a vdom library as almost like a Lisp
>> > reader macro:
>> >
>> > ```js
>> > n`.form-ctrl`(
>> >   n`input#input`("input"),
>> >   n`a[href="/submit.html"]`("Submit"))
>> > ```
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016, 17:34 Alexander Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The two code samples you posted are equivalent (modulo the obvious
>> >> mistake). AFAIU there is still only a single parsing pass for template
>> >> strings.
>> >>
>> >> On Tuesday, 12 January 2016, /#!/JoePea <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> The thing with template strings is that they are used at runtime. This
>> >>> could be slow if we're compiling things at runtime all the time,
>> >>> whereas a server-side templating solution might lead JavaScript
>> >>> functions compiled from templates (like in the case with Meteor Blaze
>> >>> Spacebars or React JSX), which can be faster at runtime.
>> >>>
>> >>> What are template strings good for besides the obvious benefit that
>> >>> they make things like
>> >>>
>> >>> ```
>> >>> var str = "llo"
>> >>> console.log(`he${str} world!`)
>> >>> ```
>> >>>
>> >>> easier to read than
>> >>>
>> >>> ```
>> >>> var str = "llo"
>> >>> console.log('he'+'str'+' world!')
>> >>> ```
>> >>>
>> >>> ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Maybe writing regexes can be nicer with template strings? I gave it a
>> >>> try at npmjs.com/regexr.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Manuel Di Iorio <[email protected]>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > Yes Bob, after a personal testing with a complete template engine
>> using
>> >>> > the
>> >>> > ES6 template strings, I realized that their use (in mine use case,
>> of
>> >>> > course) is slowest than the approach that I'm using right now (like
>> the
>> >>> > Underscore template). Thanks everyone :)
>> >>> >
>> >>> > _______________________________________________
>> >>> > es-discuss mailing list
>> >>> > [email protected]
>> >>> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>> >>> >
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> es-discuss mailing list
>> >>> [email protected]
>> >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> es-discuss mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to