Thanks Mathias.

Do you (or anyone else) know if that should be filed as a PR to
tc39/ecma262 or if it should just be a repository eventually posted in here?

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Mathias Bynens <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Accordingly with this ecma262 stage 0 summary
> > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/blob/master/stage0.md the (quite long
> time
> > ago) discussed `Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors`
> > https://gist.github.com/WebReflection/9353781 hasn't move a bit from
> there.
> >
> > However, there are already use cases
> > https://gist.github.com/WebReflection/9353781#gistcomment-1672863 and
> it's
> > already available with Babel.
> >
> > On top of that, the npm package
> > https://www.npmjs.com/package/object.getownpropertydescriptors has some
> > download, actually surpassing es7-shim repository
> > https://github.com/es-shims/es7-shim#shims
> >
> > What should be done in order to move this little improvement to a stage 1
> > situation?
>
> Consider turning your excellent gist into a repository that fulfills
> the criteria described here: https://tc39.github.io/process-document/
> See https://github.com/tc39/Array.prototype.includes for a good
> example.
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to