All clear. So, earlier, the TC39 champion was Rick Waldron but if he's ultra busy (he usually is) and somebody else would like to champion this I'd be happy to update the README with a champion reference.
AFAIK Jordan Harband is the one taking care already of the poly in the npm repo so if you (Jordan) will to champion this I'd be happy to add you to the repo and help as I can. I'll work on the rest of the mentioned problems ASAP. Best Regards On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Domenic Denicola <[email protected]> wrote: > I’ve opened a number of minor, mostly-editorial issues on the proposal. > > > > In general, how much more work you need to do depends on how many stages > you and your TC39 champion (who is it, by the way?) plan to advance the > proposal at the next meeting. Looking through > https://tc39.github.io/process-document/ I’d say: > > > > · For stage 1: > > o You need to identify your TC39 champion (it should probably be in the > document header) > > o You need to identify potential cross-cutting concerns. For example, > one might be “should there be a Reflect.getOwnPropertyDescriptors”? (to > which my answer is no, but it should be included.) > > · For stage 2: > > o Fix the editorial bugs in the spec text. > > · For stage 3: > > o Identify designated reviewers and have them sign off. > > o Get Brian to sign off. > > · For stage 4: > > o Write full tests, covering symbols, data descriptors of every > variation, accessors of every variation (get, get/set, set), throwing > getters, and proxies with throwing and inconsistent getOwnProperty and > ownPropertyKeys traps. (The proxies cases might not be necessary.) > > > > *From:* es-discuss [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of > *Andrea > Giammarchi > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 20, 2016 14:50 > *To:* Mathias Bynens <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors still at stage 0 > > > > Dear all, > > the current proposal is here > https://github.com/WebReflection/Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors#objectgetownpropertydescriptors-proposal > > > > It has been mostly copied, as suggested, from > https://github.com/tc39/Array.prototype.includes > > > > It has a reference implemntation: > https://github.com/WebReflection/Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors/blob/master/reference-implementation/index.js#L12-L68 > > > > It has at least one test: > https://github.com/WebReflection/Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors/blob/master/test/built-ins/Object/getOwnPropertyDescriptors/has-accessors.js > > > > I wonder if there is a specific amount of tests I should cover, right now > I just cover the fact it works and it does not ignore accessors. > > > > Woudl a test for symbols and one for data descriptors be enough to move > forward? > > > > Thanks. > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Mathias Bynens <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Andrea Giammarchi > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do you (or anyone else) know if that should be filed as a PR to > tc39/ecma262 > > or if it should just be a repository eventually posted in here? > > It should be a repository that can eventually move to the tc39 > organization if all goes well. Good luck! > > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
