The syntactical construct `array()` is unused as far as I know, since currently it would always generate a syntax error--an array is not a function. Thus we can use this as in
``` [1,2,3](-1) ``` Shouldn't break anything. Bob On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Andrea Giammarchi < [email protected]> wrote: > FWIW `.at` works for me. Anything really, as long as `Symbol.last` won't > even be proposed :D > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Caitlin Potter <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Nitpicking here, but the `nth` method is traditionally named `at`, if it >> were going to be formally proposed >> >>
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
