Another possibility is `Array.prototype.get()`, which would be in line with ES6 Maps.
> On 02 Feb 2016, at 21:15, Jonas Sicking <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Andrea Giammarchi > <[email protected]> wrote: >> FWIW `.at` works for me. Anything really, as long as `Symbol.last` won't >> even be proposed :D > > If we name it `.item` that would mean that a whole bunch of DOM > classes could be replaced with plain JS Arrays. > > For example FileList, MessagePortList, DOMRectList, TouchList, etc. > > It would also mean API compatibility with a whole lot of more APIs, > like NodeList, DOMTokenList and CSSValueList. While we couldn't > replace these with actual Arrays (for varying reasons), we'd end up > with classes that have more API surface in common. -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer [email protected] rauschma.de _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
