> Le 4 févr. 2016 à 21:03, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> a écrit : > > (...) The syntax still seems problematic, though, from an aesthetic point of > view. > > The `obj ?. prop` form looks natural and aligns well with how this feature > appears in other languages. The other forms are less natural: > > obj?.[expr] > func?.(...args) > new C?.(...args) > > I'm not particularly convinced by any of the other syntactic variants we've > seen.
Yeah, I fear that we couldn’t find a "good" syntax for those, given that `obj?[expr]` and `func?(...args)` are most probably excluded :-( ```js o.x?[y]+z // should be parsed as: (o.x?[y]) + z o.x?[y]+z:t // should be parsed as: o.x ? ([y] + z) : t ``` —Claude _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
