Would it not be better to expose the names (and default values, destructurings, etc) of the function arguments using reflection? For example, Reflection.arguments(Math.max).then this method can return any JSDoc it is able to parse. On 16 Apr 2016 16:53, "Caitlin Potter" <[email protected]> wrote:
> How would that interact with angular.js' Function.prototype.toString > parsing? Seems like doing that could break some content, even if it were > useful > > On Apr 16, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Axel Rauschmayer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Regarding this proposal: > https://github.com/tc39/Function-prototype-toString-revision > > Wouldn’t it make sense to include a preceding JSDoc-style comment in a > function’s (or method’s) `[[SourceText]]` value? Conceptually it is a part > of the function and it could be used to implement a REPL `help()` function. > > -- > Dr. Axel Rauschmayer > [email protected] > rauschma.de > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
