My initial motivation was to create a Python-style help() function. But I agree 
that it’s probably better not to depend on this mechanism.



> On 16 Apr 2016, at 19:28, Jordan Harband <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> As I see it, the primary purpose of the `Function#toString` proposal is to 
> document what browsers already do, and tighten it down so they can't deviate 
> further (which some browsers already have begun to do with "class", for 
> example).
> 
> "Preceding comments" would be a very hard thing to specify without unduly 
> blessing an arbitrary documentation pattern, especially one that isn't 
> universally considered to be a good thing.
> 
> Reflection methods on functions are certainly a potential separate proposal, 
> if you can make a compelling argument that it's a good idea to reflect on 
> functions in this manner.
> 
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Marius Gundersen <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Would it not be better to expose the names (and default values, 
> destructurings, etc) of the function arguments using reflection? For example, 
> Reflection.arguments(Math.max).then this method can return any JSDoc it is 
> able to parse.
> 
> On 16 Apr 2016 16:53, "Caitlin Potter" <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> How would that interact with angular.js' Function.prototype.toString parsing? 
> Seems like doing that could break some content, even if it were useful
> 
> On Apr 16, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Axel Rauschmayer <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> Regarding this proposal: 
>> https://github.com/tc39/Function-prototype-toString-revision 
>> <https://github.com/tc39/Function-prototype-toString-revision>
>> 
>> Wouldn’t it make sense to include a preceding JSDoc-style comment in a 
>> function’s (or method’s) `[[SourceText]]` value? Conceptually it is a part 
>> of the function and it could be used to implement a REPL `help()` function.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> rauschma.de <http://rauschma.de/>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss 
>> <https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss 
> <https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss 
> <https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

-- 
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
[email protected]
rauschma.de

_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to