/#!/JoePea wrote > Is there any hard evidence of the performance cost of a dynamic super? So > far I've read in various places (for example the thread linked to by > @medikoo, Axel's 2ality article on super) about there being "overhead", > but > the articles haven't quantified or put into perspective the actual > performance cost. Is it really that bad?
Adding any additional internal property for function that needs to be updated depending on circumstances, definitely will bring noticeable performance regression, and no-one would want to agree for that. Still, for me (at least now) it's not clear why it actually implies any cost (?) If /dynamic/, the super should bring not cost, as in clear thinking it's just pure keyword which forces no action/calculation from compiler/interpreter until the moment it's evaluated. It'll be great if someone clarifies that. -- View this message in context: http://mozilla.6506.n7.nabble.com/The-super-keyword-doesn-t-work-as-it-should-tp357032p357148.html Sent from the Mozilla - ECMAScript 4 discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
