You will need to convince people that their problems with your proposal are solvable and not dismiss them, not state that your idea has uses. I completely agree it has uses, but the problems vastly outweigh any use case in my mind.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Leo Dutra <[email protected]> wrote: > In JS, if you assign a string to a var containing an object... it will > become an object. > > Michael, I'm sorry to say JavaScript is not "safe". Try > Java/Haskell/Fortran. > > JavaScript is the land of pragmatic algorithms and "for internals and > abstracted away from you in a safe way". > > Workers are cool. I like it. > > But for those who knows internals, it is very very expensive. And > messaging with one worker is easy peasy. Try with 5. That amazing > onmessages everywhere without a good organization and you will reclaim your > Visual Studio in no time. > > I'm talking about do a single > > async rasterizeTheWholeGameStuff() {} > > And all the stuff, as a simple async or callback, run inside a green > thread. > > Is that really so much? I don't think so. > I think all of your statements against it, till now, are not considering > about being "seamless". > > Bösch, I think greenlets is a great example... but I'd take it in a > second step, thinking about that additionals I put above. > > They can't even agree with an existing, full of racing condition and no > atomicity clojured function body, to be run SEAMLESS in another thread. > > Maybe if I create an e-mail like [email protected] or [email protected]... > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
