I think `final` is a bit different from `immutable`. When you use `final` (Java) it means you can only set it once. But when you use `immutable` it means every time when you set it, it creates a new object. Since `let` (like Haskell) is already reserved by JS. How about `def` or directly use `immutable`?
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:30 PM jeremy nagel <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > was just chatting to colleagues about the utility of *const*. The fact > that it doesn't actually lead to immutable objects or arrays seems to make > it a bit toothless and misleading. Are there any proposals to have an > immutable version of const? I know you could use ImmutableJS but it would > be nice to have this part of the language. > > Perhaps the keyword could be *final*. > > cheers, > Jeremy > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
