Actually it isn't useless - limiting variable reassignment significantly increase code readability. Immutability is different use case and it's actually impossible to get immutability when we consider exotic objects and getters/setters.
On 8 Nov 2016 6:30 a.m., "jeremy nagel" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > was just chatting to colleagues about the utility of *const*. The fact > that it doesn't actually lead to immutable objects or arrays seems to make > it a bit toothless and misleading. Are there any proposals to have an > immutable version of const? I know you could use ImmutableJS but it would > be nice to have this part of the language. > > Perhaps the keyword could be *final*. > > cheers, > Jeremy > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
