On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 7:40 PM, kdex <[email protected]> wrote: > On that note, it might make more sense to add range literals. >
That was my thought as well -- or at least, ranges if not range literals. (A simple `Range` is trivial to implement, but I'd rather see something ubiquitous.) I don't see any active, inactive, stage 0, or finished proposals for ranges (they have been discussed: https://esdiscuss.org/topic/ranges). John, to my mind it'd be great to see this same great level of attention-to-detail, research, etc., devoted to ranges. I think iterable numbers would be too limited to be all that useful (although a subset of your proposal would be really simple to add). But I'm just a random guy on the list, no idea if the people who actually matter would be interested in a range proposal. Ranges have been put to good use in other languages/environments (some mentioned in your proposal), so... -- T.J.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
