Any reason for not just using `Boolean.parse`? (Rather than repeating `Boolean` in the function name?)
-- T.J. Crowder On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov < [email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Similar to `Number.parseInt`, the `Boolean.parseBooelan` might be useful >> for "boolean strings" retrieved from some string-based storages, which do >> not support other types at serialization. >> >> ``` >> Boolean.parseBoolean('true'); // true >> Boolean.parseBoolean('false'); // false >> ``` >> >> > OK, here the actual proposed spec for it: https://gist.github.com/ > DmitrySoshnikov/5ee1a7d51d8dbe159ae917876b27f36a > > I made it plain simple (anything which is not case-insensitive `"true"` is > `false`), and copy-pasted from Java. > > Dmitry > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
