One could argue that `parse` makes more sense, as there is really just that one way to parse a bool.
On Monday, March 20, 2017 8:04:53 PM CET Dmitry Soshnikov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:57 AM, T.J. Crowder < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Any reason for not just using `Boolean.parse`? (Rather than repeating > > `Boolean` in the function name?) > > > >> > >> > Just a copy-paste from Java, similarly was done with `parseInt` taken from > Java. But just `parse` probably would work too. For consistency and > predictability `parseBoolean` is probably better now. > > Dmitry >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
