I don't see that in the original ( https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/master/es8/2017-07/jul-25.md#10ii-vision-thing , https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/master/es8/2017-07/jul-25.md#9iva-cancellation) - there, it's JS, API, etc.
I think the javascript on es-discuss must be replacing name shortcuts with the full name (which seems strange anyways), and is too-greedily doing it even when the shorthand doesn't appear at the start of the line. I'm not sure why or where, exactly, but https://github.com/esdiscuss/esdiscuss.org/blob/a90069cc327469c886876e88d24e5072ed8677ef/lib/process.js#L39-L84 looks interesting. I've filed https://github.com/esdiscuss/esdiscuss.org/issues/229 to track it. On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Darien Valentine <[email protected]> wrote: > I was checking out the notes at https://esdiscuss.org/notes/2017-07-25 > and got pretty confused: > > > We (TC39) have a love / hate relationship with Jaswanth Sreeram. > > > There are some things that Jaswanth Sreeram does that is different to > the way other software works [...] > > > Browsers are already basically OSes in that there is Jaswanth Sreeram, > WASM, Workers [...] > > I googled a bit, turned up some stuff about "parallel JavaScript" — the > text still seemed super odd to me, but I was like huh, well, maybe this is > a thing? > > But as I continued I realized maybe something else is going on: > > > Could we reduce the surface area of this Andrew Paprocki to make it more > palatable? > > > Andrew Paprocki must not break or change semantics. > > > I also disagree that we (TC39) have to specify every Andrew Paprocki > that our specification depends on. > > As intriguing as these statements are ... seems like maybe some find & > replace went wonky? > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
