Additionally, if you enjoy your meeting notes in a rendered-markdown form, with less oddities and mistakes (but certainly not zero), these are maintained by TC39: http://tc39.github.io/tc39-notes/
Rick On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:28 PM Rick Waldron <[email protected]> wrote: > lol, that's especially amusing since Jaswanth Sreeram has not attended a > meeting since 2014. > > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 2:49 AM Jordan Harband <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't see that in the original ( >> https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/master/es8/2017-07/jul-25.md#10ii-vision-thing >> , >> https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/master/es8/2017-07/jul-25.md#9iva-cancellation) >> - there, it's JS, API, etc. >> >> I think the javascript on es-discuss must be replacing name shortcuts >> with the full name (which seems strange anyways), and is too-greedily doing >> it even when the shorthand doesn't appear at the start of the line. >> >> I'm not sure why or where, exactly, but >> https://github.com/esdiscuss/esdiscuss.org/blob/a90069cc327469c886876e88d24e5072ed8677ef/lib/process.js#L39-L84 >> looks interesting. >> >> I've filed https://github.com/esdiscuss/esdiscuss.org/issues/229 to >> track it. >> >> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Darien Valentine <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I was checking out the notes at https://esdiscuss.org/notes/2017-07-25 >>> and got pretty confused: >>> >>> > We (TC39) have a love / hate relationship with Jaswanth Sreeram. >>> >>> > There are some things that Jaswanth Sreeram does that is different to >>> the way other software works [...] >>> >>> > Browsers are already basically OSes in that there is Jaswanth Sreeram, >>> WASM, Workers [...] >>> >>> I googled a bit, turned up some stuff about "parallel JavaScript" — the >>> text still seemed super odd to me, but I was like huh, well, maybe this is >>> a thing? >>> >>> But as I continued I realized maybe something else is going on: >>> >>> > Could we reduce the surface area of this Andrew Paprocki to make it >>> more palatable? >>> >>> > Andrew Paprocki must not break or change semantics. >>> >>> > I also disagree that we (TC39) have to specify every Andrew Paprocki >>> that our specification depends on. >>> >>> As intriguing as these statements are ... seems like maybe some find & >>> replace went wonky? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
