Philosophically I agree completely with this principle. This does not have a bunch of options:
``` iterable.toObject(keyFromElement[, valueFromElement]) ``` What I proposed has only 1 variant: the fact that `valueFromElement` has a default if you don't provide it. Objects as they are are simple per insertion: 1. key, 2. value. It's not straightforward to do my (latest) proposal without it, in particular if the object property values you want doesn't contain the key itself because it's derived from a different piece of data from which it doesn't exist. On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 at 15:32 T.J. Crowder <tj.crow...@farsightsoftware.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Naveen Chawla <naveen.c...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Yeah except in what I'm saying it's optional > > My point is you'd use the right tool for the job at hand, rather than > having a single tool with a bunch of options making it complex to explain, > use, and optimize. If you review my earlier suggestion and the > back-and-forth with Darien, I think you'll see what I mean. > > -- T.J. Crowder >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
