tc39 should have staggered the release of so many high-impact changes over es6/es7/es8/etc.
es6 is essentially javascript++, like c/c++. you can't expect senior c programmers to trivially transition projects to c++, or for existing c toolings to automatically extend to c++. On 10/27/17, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > kai, what do you think would've been a better alternative? (Honestly > curious) > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 1:27 AM kai zhu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> tc39 is partly to blame for promoting the perception of javascript >> language instability, which promotes tooling instability. >> >> generators, es modules, destructing, let, fat arrows have caused >> tremendous harm to tooling stability, which has made >> frontend-development hell for everyone. >> >> >> On 10/27/17, Jordan Harband <[email protected]> wrote: >> > aka "how it feels to learn"? >> > >> > A decent response: >> > >> https://medium.com/front-end-hacking/how-it-feels-to-learn-javascript-in-2017-a934b801fbe >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:38 PM, J Decker <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> (humor?) >> https://hackernoon.com/how-it-feels-to-learn-javascript-in-2016- >> >> d3a717dd577f >> >> >> >> It all seemed so simple.... >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> es-discuss mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >> >> >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
