Protocols are not mixins - they're interfaces. They specify minimum behavior required to implement (their primary focus), not simply extended behavior. In particular, protocols and mixins would be more complementary than conflicting.
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017, 04:48 Raul-Sebastian Mihăilă <[email protected]> wrote: > I updated the proposal with sections for motivation, comparison with other > kinds of mixins and protocols. > https://github.com/raulsebastianmihaila/ecma262-definition-mixins-proposal > > The protocols, in their current form, are a naive kind of mixin > imlementation. I think it's better to separate contracts from mixins and > it's possible to use them together for using the default implementations > that the protocols may provide. > > Would any TC39 member like to champion this proposal? > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
