> Unfortunately your second intervention isn't constructive either. Great, I'll bow out. Do let me know when you find your champion, at which point I'll follow further developments with keen interest.
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Raul-Sebastian Mihăilă < [email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Bob Myers <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm a JS programmer with more decades of experience than I care to >> mention, and follow developments in language design closely. Frankly, I >> don't understand what you are trying to accomplish or why support for it >> needs to be in the language. I strongly doubt I'm the only one. Rather than >> spending your time tilting at TC39 windmills, I'd suggest a focus on >> putting together a library which implements your vision of mixins. >> > > I explained thoroughly why it would be good for it to be in the language, > to the extent that I think you simply don't want to understand what I'm > trying to accomplish. It's a very useful and popular OO feature that was > attempted many times in user code and implementing it in the language > allows for better semantics and simpler syntax. In particular, user code > doesn't have access to the [[ScriptOrModule]] slot that I'm using in my > proposal. Also, having a standard version is better. Otherwise, you can > argue the same about many other things in the language. > > Why would this be "tilting at TC39 windmills"? Esdiscuss is the right > place to discuss proposals and I think your stance is inappropriate. This > is even more surprising as TC39 is currently discussing a proposal that > includes a mixin mechanism. > > We already started a conversation that you left suspended. Unfortunately > your second intervention isn't constructive either. >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
