Yes, I was mistaken. That is possible only to do via type checking systems. it's not work of javascript of the interpreter. Thanks for explanations.
> 12 февр. 2018 г., в 10:32, T.J. Crowder <[email protected]> > написал(а): > > Previous discussion: > https://esdiscuss.org/topic/async-await-await-async-a-simpler-less-error-prone-async-syntax > > <https://esdiscuss.org/topic/async-await-await-async-a-simpler-less-error-prone-async-syntax> > > -- T.J. Crowder > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:29 AM, Александр Ефремов <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Sorry, but I didn’t understand you sentence. And I have knowledge in the > promises of course. > >> 12 февр. 2018 г., в 9:59, Isiah Meadows <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> написал(а): >> >> Yeah, and given it's the default, I'm not persuaded of the benefit to be >> gained here. >> >> (Most feature requests like these in my experience come from such users who >> use `async`/`await` without learning promises first. Without that knowledge, >> people typically don't get that it's merely syntax sugar for the common >> case, and they rarely understand that `async`/`await` is not obligatory to >> use async functions. When users realize that, this really does begin to seem >> superfluous, since the absence of a keyword or `.then`/`.catch` implies >> you're not awaiting.) >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018, 00:44 Peter Jaszkowiak <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> This certainly doesn't sound backwards compatible. Also, this is something >> that type checking systems (like typescript and flow) are very good at >> catching. >> >> On Feb 11, 2018 22:41, "Александр Ефремов" <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Sometimes when create the async functions forget to add await and later such >> mistake difficult to find. >> Maybe would be better always demand to add keyword nowait to calls returning >> promises which we don't plan to wait. But if this keyword and await keyword >> no exists then throw the error. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> <https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> <https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> <https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss> > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > <https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss> > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
