How is either operator not "a different way of calling functions"?
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:34 PM, Naveen Chawla <[email protected]> wrote: > I was just thinking about the relative merits and coexistence (or not) of > function composition operator and function pipeline operator features: > > e.g. > https://github.com/TheNavigateur/proposal-pipeline-operator-for- > function-composition > https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator > > They can of course co-exist, but there is overlap only in the respect that > both allow function pipelines to be called from left to right (except the > input parameter in the case of the composition feature, which requires > existing bracket syntax to be used to call it). If one were to be chosen, > would say that a function composition operator adds a whole new dimension > of expressive power to the language, whereas a pipeline operator only > offers a different way of calling functions. > > I was wondering about all of your thoughts about whether you'd prefer only > the pipeline operator, only the composition operator, or both, or neither > to be added to the language (these are pretty much all the possibilities), > and why. > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
