I made the PR on the ecma repo so that the diff is smaller (since I'm touching more sections than the proposal repo had). https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1118/files
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 5:27 AM, Jordan Harband <ljh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Simply theorizing about how it might be done - without an actual spec diff > (this email might be close but I can't personally reason about it) - isn't > going to achieve much, unfortunately. > > However, if you'd like to make a PR to the proposal repo, I'd be happy to > review it. If it seems possible, and if it passes the test suites, I'd be > happy to make the corresponding PR to the actual spec and test262. > > (as for "waiting a year", ES is a living standard; there's no need to wait > that long. If a change is presented that results in fewer observable calls > without violating any of the criteria that led to the current spec, I > suspect the committee and implementors would be more than happy to see the > change go in ASAP) > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
