LibreJS looks like a browser extension, not a JS engine... Aside, wow, I'm in favor of open-source, but this one is pretty out there.
-- Michael J. Ryan - http://tracker1.info On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:11 AM Joe Eagar <[email protected]> wrote: > LibreJS? The FSF is seriously escalating the plugin/scripting issue? > > Joe > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:07 PM, J Decker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I guess when it comes to other projects Wikipedia Wikipedia should be >>> enough: >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ECMAScript_engines >>> >>> >> They're missing at least one... >> https://www.gnu.org/software/librejs/ which looks like it is missing es6 >> features (as of aug last year anyway... still?) >> >> >>> FWIW I think only Chakra, SpiderMonkey, JavaScriptCore, Nashorn, >>> QtScript (although, not standard at all), Duktape, Moddable (R.I.P. >>> Kinoma), Espruino, MuJS (new to me!), and JerryScript are the actively >>> used/developed/maintained, and the list misses GJS, but I guess that's >>> because it's based on SpiderMonkey. >>> >>> Purely ES5 start with IE9 on browser land, but includes IE11 too which >>> is still quite popular. >>> >>> Not fully ES2015 is Chrome 49 which is the latest Chrome version >>> supported in both Windows XP and Vista and there are still users that won't >>> let that old/cracked OS go, regardless all security issues they have. >>> >>> Opera 36 is at the same state of Chrome 49, and things are pretty >>> different on mobile too. >>> >>> All phones from 2015 are stuck behind older Android versions or, even >>> worst, Samsung Internet, like it is for the Galaxy A3 case which is still a >>> pretty good looking phone. >>> >>> However, Samsung Browser 4.0 is not too bad compared to IE11, as you can >>> see in this gist: >>> >>> https://gist.github.com/WebReflection/1411b420574c1cc4b4f08fcf9cd960c8#gistcomment-2399378 >>> >>> Have I answered your question ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:18 PM, /#!/JoePea <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm curious to know how many pure ES% environments (with or without >>>> non-standard features like __proto__, and without any ES6 features) are >>>> still being used in the wild. >>>> >>>> Would this come down to a browser statistics lookup? I believe there >>>> are other projects that use ES, like Rhino, Espruino, etc. Do you know of >>>> some place to get such statistics besides for browsers? >>>> >>>> */#!/*JoePea >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> es-discuss mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >> > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
