The document says both "The TC39 committee must approve acceptance for each stage." (which I read as, even if there's no entrance criteria) and "Such submissions must either come from members of TC39 or from non-members who have registered via Ecma International,", for one, but in practice, inclusion into the proposals repo requires involvement (championing or otherwise) from a TC39 member.
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Bob Myers <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://tc39.github.io/process-document/ > > This document says that there are no entrance criteria for Stage 0. In > practice, however, when I attempted to add a proposal to the phase 0 list, > via a PR to https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/stage-0- > proposals.md, it was rejected based on the fact that a champion is in > fact required even for stage 0, and all the proposals listed on the stage 0 > page do indeed have champions listed. > > I seem to recall pointing out this inconsistency a long time ago and > someone responded that the docs were out of date and would be fixed pretty > soon. > > Bob > > On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 10:45 PM Jordan Harband <[email protected]> wrote: > >> They're not written down anywhere, and they change based on the makeup of >> the committee. >> >> However, in general, the wider committee strives to avoid complexity, and >> absolutely will demand a justification for adding anything to JavaScript, >> including for changing the *process by which changes are made* to >> JavaScript. >> >> https://github.com/tc39/proposals is the list of current proposals, >> https://tc39.github.io/process-document/ describes the stage process, >> and https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md >> describes how one can contribute. >> >> I strongly encourage thorough familiarization with all those documents, >> including the spec/language itself, if you want to increase the >> effectiveness of a proposal. >> >> On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 10:12 AM, kdex <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> A good place to start is [1]. >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/tc39/proposals >>> >>> On Saturday, May 12, 2018 7:11:36 PM CEST Abdul Shabazz wrote: >>> > I wasn't aware of the committees view of synonyms and that they >>> perceive >>> > them ad clutter. This unfortunate but i will moderate my future >>> suggestions >>> > accordingly. btw where can i find their submission/proposal guidelines? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
