Cool!

So for me, the point would be symmetry with Map and Set.

As such my poly would go like so:

```js
Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, "append", {
    writable: true,
    configurable: true,
    value: function(arg) {
        this.push(arg);
        return this;
    }
});
```

(Which is basically what I end up doing with && in a => in reduce() calls...)

> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 5:56 PM, Alexander Lichter <e...@lichter.io> wrote:
> > An optimization would be great because in comparison to the existing concat
> > method, rest/spread is significantly slower at the moment (see
> > https://jsperf.com/single-array-composition)
> 
> There's a limit to how much optimization can address the fact that 
> `[...original, ...additions]` has to create a new array. And creating the 
> array is significant, as we can see in the difference between `concat` and 
> `push`: https://jsperf.com/concat-vs-push-number-42
> 
> I've often wanted an `Array.prototype.append` (often enough I've been known 
> to add it on occasion; obviously only in app/page code, not in lib code). It 
> would be a good addition in my view. I tend to suspect the name isn't 
> web-safe, though. So that would need investigation and design.
> 
> The polyfill is trivial:
> 
> ```js
> Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, "append", {
>     value: function(...sources) {
>         for (let o = 0, olen = sources.length; o < olen; ++o) {
>             const source = sources[o];
>             for (let i = 0, ilen = source.length; i < ilen; ++i) {
>                 this.push(source[i]);
>             }
>         }
>         return this;
>     },
>     writable: true,
>     configurable: true
> });
> 
> ```
> 
> 
> I've avoided iterators and such as a first pass at optimization (and it seems 
> to do okay: https://jsperf.com/push-vs-append-number-42/1). Didn't use 
> `push.apply` because of the limits it has on it in some implementations. This 
> version assumes all entries are array-like and should have their entries 
> added to the array on which it's called. There are a lot of other designs one 
> could make, though. Just one argument (you can always chain); a flattening 
> version; etc., etc.
> 
> 
> -- T.J. Crowder
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to