On Fri, Jun 22, 2018, 6:51 PM doodad-js Admin <[email protected]> wrote:
> *This is silly. I can want these without wanting them built using > substandard tools.* > > > > That’s the point why I bring it to ES. Nothing on the “user land” can > provide something reliable, apart a complete JS runtime library compiled to > “WASM” or “asm.js”. And... that’s silly. > > > For the last time, why do you believe opcode filtering can? > > *From:* Mike Samuel <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2018 6:04 PM > *To:* doodad-js Admin <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Isiah Meadows <[email protected]>; es-discuss < > [email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: FW: Proposal: safeEval > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018, 5:30 PM doodad-js Admin <[email protected]> wrote: > > *“Blacklisting or whitelisting, that’s an open discussion”: It really > isn't.* > > > > So for you, blacklisting or whitelisting is not opened to a discussion? > > No. > > Case based reasoning doesn't work when the partition of cases can't be > enumerated so if we want confidence in our tools we ought prefer > whitelisting. > > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > Virus-free. > www.avg.com > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > <#m_2334123076367658371_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
