Ecma data - including the contents of this list - needs to live for decades in ecma's archives. Very few alternatives have the necessary staying power.
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Isiah Meadows <isiahmead...@gmail.com> wrote: > First, I found this resource that does clarify a *few* things, but it > doesn't go over details. > > - https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#new-feature- > proposals > > Second, if you feel strongly enough, feel free to ping one of the > active committee members either through email or on #tc39 (on Freenode > IRC) to see about getting a little more clarification to the process. > > Oh, and side note: one plus to having it email-only is that it's > easier to respond on-the-fly on mobile, and that's not quite so easy > when it's all on some platform thingy. (The list also isn't quite > active enough to merit the need for sorting and organization beyond > what https://esdiscuss.org/ provides.) > > ----- > > Isiah Meadows > m...@isiahmeadows.com > www.isiahmeadows.com > > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Mark <m...@heyimmark.com> wrote: > > Yeah I looked at those but they are rather outdated. A lot of the > pushback > > from moving to other platforms (ie. lack of mailing list features, forced > > browser usage, etc) are no longer the case and therefore dont really help > > explain why this list has avoided doing it for so long now. > > > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018, 3:12 PM Jerry Schulteis <jdschult...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > >> > >> One way to find related conversations is to add site:esdiscuss.org to > the > >> search terms. > >> E.g. "site:esdiscuss.org mailing list alternative": > >> > >> > >> https://esdiscuss.org/topic/meta-proposal-switch-es- > discuss-from-a-mailing-list-to-using-the-tc39-github- > issue-tracker-for-discussion > >> > >> https://esdiscuss.org/topic/move-es-discuss-to-discuss-webplatform-org > >> > >> Perhaps such a hint, as well as guidelines for self-vetting proposals > >> before submitting, should appear in the list welcome message or the > >> information page. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Monday, July 2, 2018, 12:22:14 PM CDT, Mark <m...@heyimmark.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> previous related conversations are not being considered because they are > >> not prominent or easily found- they are kept in an archive that is > totally > >> separate from the email clients being used to facilitate these mailing > list > >> discussions. This means it is not likely that a person making a > proposal, > >> who is new to this mailing list format (which is mostly the case with > new > >> proposals), will even see the archives. > >> > >> Another point: there are plenty of alternative solutions out there that > >> would make this list much more usable and efficient (discourse, slack, > >> GitHub etc), which have wide support and are reliable. Is there a > reason why > >> this list hasn’t embraced any of these newer technologies? Although not > >> necessary, they offer strong feature sets that will make it quite easy > to > >> provide solutions to the above points. > >> > >> _______________ > >> es-discuss mailing list > >> es-discuss@mozilla.org > >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > es-discuss mailing list > > es-discuss@mozilla.org > > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
