Why not? People are generating less docs now? That doesn't sound good! #!/JoePea
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 4:15 PM Isiah Meadows <cont...@isiahmeadows.com> wrote: > > JSDoc is not dead (far from it), people just don't frequently use > automated docs generation tooling in the JS community. Most the actual > use JSDoc provides nowadays is editor autocomplete hints and > integrating with TypeScript (in cases where changing the extension > isn't possible for whatever reason), so while it's still useful, it's > just not used in the same places it was used previously. > > ----- > > Isiah Meadows > cont...@isiahmeadows.com > www.isiahmeadows.com > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 6:39 PM Michaël Rouges <michael.rou...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Since JSDoc seems cerebrally dead, why the TC39 doesn't make a real > > documentation standard, evolving with the langage? > > > > Actually, a part of the JS community are exiling to TS to type anything > > and the rest are just despited by the very outdated version of JSDoc but > > don't want to add TS to their stack. > > > > IMHO, it's really urgent to have something formal to solve that missing > > point of my favorite language. > > > > What would it take to make this dream come true, please? > > > > > > Michaël Rouges - https://github.com/Lcfvs - @Lcfvs > > _______________________________________________ > > es-discuss mailing list > > es-discuss@mozilla.org > > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
