On 8/21/07, Brendan Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 21, 2007, at 1:24 AM, zwetan wrote: > > > +1 for being able to set the attributes > > > > but I think we should not add a TRANSIENT attributes for ES3, > > DONTENUM should be enought and backward compatible > > See http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:enumerability >
ok, but is it still at the proposal stage or does DontEnum() and DontDelete() are accepted :) ? also to be "complete" a ReadOnly() could also be usefull, I mean also in the context of JSON serialization/deserialization to protect some properties to be overriden by the parsing of a JSON string use case: a config file with protected properties you could load a JSON string to change the configuration but some parameters would just be protected by the ReadOnly() it could even be more efficient than a whitelist or blacklist zwetan _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list Es4-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
