We must keep DontDelete and ReadOnly invariant. See my reply to zwetan. /be
On Aug 21, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Kris Zyp wrote: >>> but I think we should not add a TRANSIENT attributes for ES3, >>> DONTENUM should be enought and backward compatible >> >> See http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:enumerability > If we added the ability to set attributes, the propertyIsEnumerable > extra > parameter proposal would be unnecessary (albiet convenient). Also, > IMHO, > transient and dontenum are different concepts. They both affect > enumeration, > but one in the context of introspection and one in the context of > serialization. > Kris > > _______________________________________________ > Es4-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
