On Jan 3, 2008, at 9:36 AM, Igor Bukanov wrote:
> On 03/01/2008, Brendan Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> let (f = function() { ... f() ... }) { ... }
>>
>> The call to f within itself always refers to itself.
>
> I do not see how ES3 is relevant to this second case.
Oops, sorry -- pre-caffeine here. I misread that lambda as a named
function expression. But it's anonymous, and its scope chain (as
noted) starts with the let's outer scope, so it won't find itself
bound to the name f.
> So I would like to clarify if in
>
> function f() { }
>
> let (f = function() { ... f() ... }) { ... }
>
> f() should refer to the outer f or let-bound f.
Outer, no question.
> I thought that function definitions in the let blocks like in let
> (function f()) { } is supported for uniformity with let declarations
> that allow a usage like:
>
> let function f() { };
I missed that if so -- did you see this in the wiki, a trac ticket,
or another doc?
/be
_______________________________________________
Es4-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
