On 03/01/2008, Brendan Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > let (f = function() { ... f() ... }) { ... }
>
> The call to f within itself always refers to itself.
I do not see how ES3 is relevant to this second case. So I would like
to clarify if in
function f() { }
let (f = function() { ... f() ... }) { ... }
f() should refer to the outer f or let-bound f.
> > let (function f() { print("f is called"); f(); }) {
>
> This is not valid syntax. The let head should contain optionally
> annotated, optionally initialised, unqualified variable names, comma-
> separated.
I thought that function definitions in the let blocks like in let
(function f()) { } is supported for uniformity with let declarations
that allow a usage like:
let function f() { };
Regards, Igor
_______________________________________________
Es4-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
