> syntax. So only > > function get x() ++i; > > or similar in a class (static or instance) would make a DontDelete > binding, if not a fixture. My two cents,
That an object literal can make a getter that can be deleted, but never restored, makes for an odd bit of assymetry doesn't it? A getter can be deleted, but not added. But, I agree that a getter generated from an object literal should probably still be deletable for compatibility. Too bad there isn't a way to add getters to an existing object to restore the symmetry. Kris _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
