I think I need to understand the following before I can comprehend the rest:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Lars Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Note also that > > eval(s) > > is the same as > > null::eval(s) > > so arguments about 'namespaced operators' are probably not right. Not right in what sense? I'm not sure whether you're claiming that the operator form of intrinsic::eval isn't a namespaced operator (in which case, how is it not a pun?) or that it's not the *only* namespaced operator. (Or maybe you mean something else entirely...) Is the following legal ES4: (x null::< y) (I would have thought no.) Do operator identifiers (like '<') name syntactic bindings? Or maybe the term 'operator' is being used equivocally here? _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
