On 4/2/08, Lars Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Lars, does this mean that expr::[expr] can't introduce > > lexical bindings? Or: in strict mode, it can't, but in > > standard it can? > > > It can't introduce bindings; it's just a name.
I meant something like: var foo::[bar] = baz; My objection to expr::[expr] in earlier messages was based on the assumption that these computed names could be used on the left-hand side of an assignment expression -- which, I'm pretty sure, is syntactically valid. So, for example: var foo = "hello"; null::["foo"] = "goodbye"; print(foo); // prints "goodbye" But I guess there are two cases: one where a new binding would be introduced and another where the expression would evaluate to an already bound name (as in the previous example). So... are either of those cases legal? _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list Es4-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
