On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Jon Zeppieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yep, I agree with this, too. I certainly wouldn't want to mandate > > var public::x > > in classes and wouldn't really want to write it myself. But there's > some value in having a single, canonical syntactic form that will work > everywhere. (If ES5 adds some kind of macro system, it would be more > useful.)
In case it isn't clear, I'm not asking "Why not drop the Java-like syntax?" but rather, "Why not consider the Java-like syntax as sugar on top of a canonical syntax that works in initializers and classes?" _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
