>> === "Type" suffix on structural type names === >> >> The proposal defines structural types named IteratorType, >> IterableType, >> and ItemizableType. I think they should be named Iterator, Iterable, >> and Itemizable.
+1 > I agree. The -Type suffix has bothered me, although the reflect:: > interface names use it too (for better reasons). I'm guilty, I will > remove it (Dave Herman was going to weigh in on it, and I bet he > agrees). Yes, the -Type suffix makes sense in the reflect:: interfaces, because their instances *are* types (reflections of types, at least). But IterableType et al don't pass the "is-a" test. Dave _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
