>> I agree. The -Type suffix has bothered me, although the reflect::
>> interface names use it too (for better reasons). I'm guilty, I will
>> remove it (Dave Herman was going to weigh in on it, and I bet he
>> agrees).
>
> Yes, the -Type suffix makes sense in the reflect:: interfaces, because
> their instances *are* types (reflections of types, at least). But
> IterableType et al don't pass the "is-a" test.
I've updated the iterators/generators proposal page to eliminate the
-Type suffix from
ItemizableType, IterableType, ContainerType, IteratorType
I'll update the RI shortly.
Dave
_______________________________________________
Es4-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
